Special Counsel Jack Smith has highlighted a report by Special Counsel Robert Hur on President Joe Biden as a key piece of evidence to emphasize the severity of former President Donald Trump’s alleged mishandling of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate.
Hur’s investigation into documents found at Biden’s home and office ended without charges, sparking political debate, particularly around comments on Biden’s age and memory. However, Hur’s conclusion that Biden’s actions were not as grave as Trump’s has been less emphasized.
Trump is charged with illegally storing classified national defense information at his Florida resort, according to court documents. In response to attempts by Trump and his co-defendants to gather evidence for their claim of being subject to “selective prosecution,” Smith has countered in a recent court filing.
He pointed out that, unlike the case with Biden where there was no clear indication of highly classified material, Trump allegedly made concerted efforts to obstruct justice and hinder the retrieval of documents marked as classified.
“The defendants have not identified anyone who has engaged in a remotely similar suite of willful and deceitful criminal conduct and not been prosecuted,” wrote Smith in his new filing. “For example, their primary competitor is Joseph R. Biden … But as the Hur Report itself recognizes, ‘several material distinctions between Mr. Trump’s case and Mr. Biden’s are clear.'”
Smith asserts that this significant difference in conduct between Trump and Biden is sufficient to dismiss the defendants’ claims of selective prosecution. Earlier in the month, Trump made a public appeal to Smith, urging the Special Counsel to cease all legal actions against him to facilitate national healing. This request comes amidst the ongoing legal battle over the classified documents, which has become a focal point of contention in the political and legal spheres.
Smith’s use of the Hur Report to distinguish the cases of Biden and Trump underlines the complexities involved in handling classified information by high-profile political figures. It also brings to light the legal and ethical considerations that come into play when assessing such situations. As the legal proceedings against Trump continue, the comparisons drawn by Smith between the two cases are likely to be scrutinized further, especially in the context of the broader political implications and the standards applied to the handling of sensitive national security information.
The former president purportedly held onto classified documents despite a subpoena from the government to return them.
“If Special Counsel Jack Smith wants to do good for our Country, and help to unify it, he should drop all Litigation against Joe Biden’s Political Opponent, ME, and let our Country HEAL,” Trump posted on his own social media site, Truth Social.
He added, “This would be a far bigger and better achievement than anything he has ever done and will be easy for the Great Patriots of our Country to understand in light of Special Counsel Robert Hur’s Document Report on Joe Biden, where the evidence is overwhelming that he ‘willfully retained’ important documents!”
