Max Burns, a known Democratic strategist, and commentator, recently made a case in an MSNBC opinion article that Vice President Kamala Harris is an underutilized asset in President Joe Biden’s administration. Burns posited that if given a broader role, Harris could significantly bolster Biden’s campaign.
In an attempt to amplify Burns’ perspective, MSNBC shared the article on a social media platform, inviting readers to consider Harris as a pivotal member of Biden’s team. However, this promotion backfired, as the post was met with widespread criticism and skepticism. The disparity between the number of views and the low “likes” the post received indicates strong disagreement with Burns’ viewpoint.
Critics were quick to point out several contentious episodes in Harris’s tenure. One notable incident was her disagreement with Florida Governor Ron DeSantis over the state’s education standards. The debate was cited by many as an example of Harris’s inability to effectively communicate her stance.
Furthermore, polls appear to reflect a broader public skepticism about Harris’s performance. FiveThirtyEight’s recent poll, for instance, revealed that only 40% approved of her work, while 52% disapproved.
Burns’ article, intended to spotlight Harris’s potential and strengths, ended up underscoring existing concerns. Many see the Vice President’s performance as indicative of larger issues within the Biden administration. This narrative, coupled with President Biden’s age and health concerns, has led to increased speculation about Harris’s potential future role, should Biden decide not to seek a second term or be unable to fulfill his duties.
