Diddy Seeks Court Intervention to Limit Public Statements Amid Escalating Assault Allegations

Sean “Diddy” Combs is calling for court intervention to restrict public statements surrounding the ongoing sexual assault allegations against him. Combs’ legal team filed a motion on Sunday, urging the court to expedite a process that would limit statements made outside of court, specifically targeting claims from potential witnesses.

According to TMZ, one such individual is Courtney Burgess, who has recently given several interviews through his lawyer, Ariel Mitchell. In these interviews, Mitchell alleged that Burgess was summoned to testify because he has access to or knowledge of compromising videos involving Combs and high-profile celebrities.

In response, Combs’ legal team argued in court documents that the statements against him were “false and defamatory.” Combs, the founder of Bad Boy Records, specifically addressed claims circulating in the media about so-called “freak offs” that allegedly involved men and “parties.” Combs’ attorneys contend that the government’s investigation has found no evidence of men, minors, or organized parties being involved in these supposed events.

Combs’ lawyers argue that failure to treat these claims as “an extortion scam” only fuels online conspiracy theories, which they believe jeopardize his ability to receive a fair trial. They point to the spread of rumors online as intensifying public perception and adding undue bias before the legal process unfolds.

These new accusations come on the heels of serious criminal charges against Combs, who was arrested in September on allegations including sex trafficking, racketeering, and transportation for prostitution. In addition to the criminal case, Combs is facing several civil lawsuits. Despite the allegations, he has maintained his innocence and denied all accusations of misconduct. He is currently being held without bail, with a trial date set for May 5.

Combs’ legal team hopes that limiting external statements will help reduce the spread of misinformation and protect his right to a fair trial. As the case moves forward, public interest remains high, with both sides preparing for a contentious legal battle.