Jack Smith
Doug Mills/The New York Times

Jack Smith’s Report Exposes Systemic Failures in Holding Trump Accountable, David Frum Warns

Special counsel Jack Smith’s report on efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election underscores systemic failures in holding President-elect Donald Trump accountable, conservative analyst David Frum argued in The Atlantic on Tuesday.

While Trump spent the morning railing against the report, Frum suggested it ultimately reflects a victory for the former president. “Compared with the present outcome, it would have been better if President Joe Biden had pardoned Trump for the January 6 coup attempt,” Frum wrote.

“A pardon would at least have upheld the theory that violent election overthrows are wrong and illegal. A pardon would have said: The U.S. government can hold violent actors to account. It just chooses not to do so in this case. Instead, the special counsel’s report delivers a confession of the helplessness of the U.S. government.”

Frum criticized the lack of meaningful consequences for Trump and his supporters, who, he said, “have transgressed the most fundamental rule of a constitutional regime, the prohibition against political violence — and instead of suffering consequences, they have survived, profited, and returned to power.”

Jack Smith
Photo: Robin Van Lonkhuijsen/AFP via Getty Images

He further argued that Trump’s return to power has emboldened him. In his first term, Frum noted, some figures within Trump’s administration attempted to check his authority. Now, loyalty to the January 6 effort has become a “test of loyalty” for those seeking roles in his administration.

Frum also reflected on the broader legal landscape that has enabled this outcome. The Supreme Court’s attempts to define the limits of presidential immunity for criminal acts committed in office produced a muddled precedent, leaving many legal experts dissatisfied.

“Now comes the Smith report with its simpler answer: If a former president wins reelection, he has immunity for even the worst possible crimes committed during his first term in office,” Frum concluded. “The incentives contained in this outcome are clear, if perverse. And they are deeply sinister to the future of democracy in the United States.”

Frum’s analysis paints a dire picture of the implications of Trump’s political resurgence and the systemic failures to hold him accountable, framing it as a significant threat to democratic norms and institutions.

Related posts

Inside Melania’s Private Warning to Vanessa Trump About Trump Jr.: ‘The Trump Men Are the Same’

Bente Birkeland

Trump’s Lawsuit Against Pollster Ann Selzer Blasted as Hypocrisy by National Review

Alex Jane

Drama Unfolds in Trump’s Closing Argument as Judge Sets Conditions in New York Civil Fraud Trial

Alex Jane

“I don’t think it’s appropriate for the committee to pay the legal bills” Trump Eyes RNC Leadership for Personal Gain Amid Legal Fee Concerns

Alex Bollinger

Melania Trump Defends Donald Trump’s ‘Boy Talk,’ Claims He Was ‘Provoked’ Amid Assault Allegations

Bente Birkeland

Caitlyn Jenner Mocks Tim Walz Over ‘Masculinity’ Claim: ‘I’m More Masculine Than Him’

Bente Birkeland